By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept

Your #1 guide to start a business and grow it the right way…

BuckheadFunds

  • Home
  • Startups
  • Start A Business
    • Business Plans
    • Branding
    • Business Ideas
    • Business Models
    • Fundraising
  • Growing a Business
  • Funding
  • More
    • Tax Preparation
    • Leadership
    • Marketing
Subscribe
Aa
BuckheadFundsBuckheadFunds
  • Startups
  • Start A Business
  • Growing a Business
  • Funding
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Tax Preparation
Search
  • Home
  • Startups
  • Start A Business
    • Business Plans
    • Branding
    • Business Ideas
    • Business Models
    • Fundraising
  • Growing a Business
  • Funding
  • More
    • Tax Preparation
    • Leadership
    • Marketing
Made by ThemeRuby using the Foxiz theme Powered by WordPress
BuckheadFunds > Leadership > Why Do We Know So Little About How Asset Managers Are Paid?

Why Do We Know So Little About How Asset Managers Are Paid?

News Room By News Room July 24, 2023 7 Min Read
Share

Relative to the very detailed data on the compensation of a CEO of a public company, disclosures on compensation of asset managers are sketchy at best. Why have stakeholders not pushed for similarly detailed disclosures for asset managers?

I had spent some time in recent weeks thinking about our investor ecosystem, especially whether the idea of long term investing is passe. During the course of that investigation, I heard time and again from various stakeholders that a key piece of the puzzle lies in the asset manager’s incentives. These parties alleged that although their funds mission statements state that they want to invest for the long run, the managers running the funds are evaluated, implicitly or explicitly, against quarterly or yearly alphas that the funds generate. I set out to investigate these claims.

In my prior piece on long term investing, I found three asset managers, Putnam, Gabelli and Schroders, who seem to hold stocks for long periods of time. As a student of management practices, I wanted to learn how these funds compensate their managers. I could not find something resembling a proxy statement for Putnam and Schroders. Gabelli Funds publishes proxy statements for a dozen funds. I looked through a few of these. In general, there is some information here about how the trustees of the fund are paid but virtually nothing on how the managers responsible for overseeing the fund are evaluated and compensated.

Next, I looked at the largest funds these asset managers run. The Large Value Cap fund is reportedly the largest fund run by Putnam with assets under management (AUM) of around $18 billion. The fund is managed by Lauren DeMore and Darren Jaroch.

The Statement of Additional Information (SAI) of the fund suggests that Ms. DeMore and Mr. Jaroch manage 15 funds with assets of $4 billion.

Regarding how the fund managers are compensated, page I-19 of the SAI states, “Portfolio managers are evaluated and compensated across specified products they manage, in part, based on their performance relative to the applicable benchmark, based on a blend of 3-year and 5-year performance, or, if shorter, the period of time that the portfolio manager has managed the product. In addition to their individual performance, evaluations take into account the performance of their group and a subjective component.

Each portfolio manager is assigned an industry-competitive incentive compensation target consistent with this goal and evaluation framework. Actual incentive compensation may be higher or lower than the target, based on individual, group, and subjective performance, and may also reflect the performance of Putnam as a firm.

Incentive compensation includes a cash bonus and may also include grants of deferred cash, stock or options. In addition to incentive compensation, portfolio managers receive fixed annual salaries typically based on level of responsibility and experience.

For this fund, Putnam evaluates performance based on the fund’s pre-tax return relative to its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.” Note that I have underlined select text for expositional purposes.

Perhaps to signal skin in the game, the disclosure also lists the range of equity interests owned by the portfolio managers as follows:

“The dollar range of shares of the fund owned by each portfolio manager at the end of the fund’s last fiscal year, including investments by immediate family members and amounts invested through retirement and deferred compensation plans, was as follows:

Portfolio managers Dollar range of shares owned

Darren Jaroch over $1,000,000

Lauren DeMore $100,001-$500,000.”

So, what do we learn from this disclosure about implicit and explicit asset manager incentives?

These fund managers appear to be evaluated against the 3-year or 5-year performance of the fund relative to that of an index. The pay function consists of some combination of a fixed salary and some skin in the game via equity. Mr. Jaroch has more skin in the game as he holds more than $1 million of his personal net worth in the fund, although we don’t how much more than $1 million. These fund managers manage 15 other funds. Hence, it is hard to know how the performance of this fund relative to the Russell 1000 value index affects their compensation.

The Putnam website states that Mr. Jaroch has been with Putnam for 24 years and in the industry for 27. Ms. DeMore has been with Putnam for 17 years and in the industry for 21 years. However, Mr. Jaroch been managing the Large Value Fund since 2012 and Ms. DeMore since 2019. Over the last 10 years, the fund has returned 10.82% p.a. before sales loads and taxes whereas the Russell 1000 Value Index has returned 9.13% p.a. The annualized expense ratio for the category of the fund with no upfront load is between 0.55% – 0.65%. So, the fund has beaten the index by around 115 basis points a year before taxes is considered.

Relative to the very detailed data on the compensation of a CEO of a public company, these disclosures are sketchy at best. Why have stakeholders not pushed for similarly detailed disclosures for asset managers?

One could counterargue that, as an asset manager, you live and die by the sword of alpha, AUM, and Morningstar ratings of the fund. Perhaps. But that arguably makes the short termism problem even worse as investors are unaware of the long-term incentives of the managers running the fund. Hence, they are likely to simply follow performance.

The opacity related to asset manager pay arguably gets worse in private equity. When I ran this piece by an industry veteran, she remarked, “people get bent out of shape about Jaime Dimon’s pay package of $35 million but senior managers in private equity funds make much more. Private equity asset manager compensation deserves more scrutiny.” A topic I intend to get to in the near future.

Read the full article here

News Room July 24, 2023 July 24, 2023
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Previous Article Twitter rebrands to X, and marketers are confused
Next Article How Sports Marketers Can Move Beyond Arena-Sized Events
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wake up with our popular morning roundup of the day's top startup and business stories

Stay Updated

Get the latest headlines, discounts for the military community, and guides to maximizing your benefits
Subscribe

Top Picks

You’re Making It Hard for People to Be Honest With You — Here’s How to Make Them Finally Speak Up
May 10, 2025
Here’s What Every Entrepreneur Needs to Know About Pivoting
May 10, 2025
Welcome to Sam Altman’s Orb Store
May 10, 2025
A Great Domain Name Can Add Millions to Your Business — Here’s How to Get One (Even If It’s Already Taken)
May 10, 2025
YouTube puts the spotlight on creators at this year’s NewFronts
May 10, 2025

You Might Also Like

Here’s What Every Entrepreneur Needs to Know About Pivoting

Leadership

Junkluggers Franchise President’s Secrets to Success

Leadership

Couple’s Small Business Is a Multimillion-Dollar Success

Leadership

Think You Know Body Language? These 6 Myths Say Otherwise

Leadership

© 2024 BuckheadFunds. All Rights Reserved.

Helpful Links

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Resources

  • Start A Business
  • Funding
  • Growing a Business
  • Leadership
  • Marketing

Popuplar

Trust Is a Business Metric Now. Here’s How to Earn It.
Junkluggers Franchise President’s Secrets to Success
OpenAI and the FDA Are Holding Talks About Using AI In Drug Evaluation

We provide daily business and startup news, benefits information, and how to grow your small business, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?